White label video solution
Trainable AI Chatbot
White label messaging app
White label telehealth
AI medical assistant
Tools to build your own HIPAA telehealth app
Secure hosting with encryption and BAA
QuickBlox Discord
Community
Shared cloud environments use multi-tenant infrastructure managed by a provider. Dedicated cloud environments allocate isolated resources to a single organization within a provider’s data center. On-premises hosting places physical servers inside the healthcare organization’s own facilities.
Each model can support HIPAA-compliant deployments when properly configured, but they differ significantly in governance burden, accountability, and long-term operational flexibility. This comparison focuses specifically on infrastructure isolation and governance differences — not broader deployment architecture strategy.
Healthcare systems process protected health information (PHI), clinical documentation, secure messaging threads, and telehealth video data. How infrastructure is segmented and controlled directly affects:
Hosting architecture is not just a technical decision — it shapes how securely healthcare applications operate at scale.
This page evaluates how isolation level affects governance burden and operational accountability across healthcare hosting models.
In healthcare, isolation level influences governance complexity more than compliance eligibility.
Shared cloud environments host multiple organizations within the same physical infrastructure. Resources such as compute, storage, and networking are logically separated but physically shared.
Shared cloud deployments are commonly used by telehealth providers, digital health startups, and healthcare SaaS platforms.
When deployed under a signed Business Associate Agreement (BAA) and properly configured with encryption, access controls, and audit logging, shared cloud can support HIPAA requirements.
However, infrastructure customization may be limited compared to dedicated or on-prem models. Organizations operate within provider-defined architectural boundaries.
This model prioritizes operational efficiency and scalability.
Dedicated cloud environments allocate isolated infrastructure resources exclusively to one healthcare organization while still leveraging the provider’s data center and virtualization platform.
Dedicated cloud hosting is often selected by:
It provides stronger isolation without requiring internal hardware ownership.
Dedicated cloud increases configuration control without requiring physical infrastructure management.
This model often strikes a balance between operational manageability and infrastructure control.
On-premises hosting places physical servers within the healthcare organization’s own facilities.
On-premises environments may be chosen when:
However, this model shifts full responsibility for:
On-premises hosting offers maximum control — and maximum accountability.
While it provides strong governance authority, it requires significant operational resources.
| Feature | Shared Cloud | Dedicated Cloud | On-Premises |
| Infrastructure Isolation | Logical (multi-tenant) | Single-tenant | Physical |
| Scalability | High | High | Limited |
| Capital Expense | Low | Moderate | High |
| Operational Burden | Lower | Moderate | High |
| Customization Flexibility | Moderate | High | Very High |
| Hardware Ownership | Provider | Provider | Organization |
No hosting model is inherently HIPAA compliant by default. Compliance depends on:
The hosting label alone does not determine regulatory posture — configuration, oversight, and risk management do.
Healthcare organizations must evaluate which isolation model aligns with their governance maturity, internal IT capacity, and risk tolerance.
QuickBlox communication APIs and SDKs can be deployed across shared cloud, dedicated cloud, and enterprise-controlled hosting environments depending on organizational requirements.
For a broader overview of hosting deployment models — including hybrid architecture, VPC environments, and integration strategy — see our guide to hosting deployment models for healthcare communication platforms.
Yes, shared cloud can be secure enough for healthcare when properly configured and supported by a signed BAA. Security depends on access controls, encryption, monitoring, and governance — not solely on whether infrastructure is multi-tenant. However, some organizations prefer dedicated environments for greater isolation and customization.
No. HIPAA does not require dedicated cloud infrastructure. Compliance depends on safeguards and operational controls, not on whether infrastructure is single-tenant. Dedicated cloud may offer greater isolation and control, but it is not a regulatory requirement.
No. HIPAA does not mandate on-premises hosting. Many hospitals use cloud-based or hybrid architectures successfully. On-premises infrastructure may be chosen for integration with legacy systems, data residency concerns, or internal policy preferences — not because it is required by HIPAA.
There is no single “best” model. Shared cloud supports scalability and faster deployment, while dedicated or hybrid environments may offer greater control and integration flexibility. The optimal model depends on organizational risk tolerance, integration needs, and operational capacity.
Infrastructure isolation can influence audit readiness, but it does not determine compliance. Audits focus on implemented safeguards, access controls, logging, and documented policies. Dedicated environments may simplify evidence collection, but shared cloud deployments can also meet audit requirements when properly governed.
Last reviewed: February 2026
Written by: Gail M.